Brief Of U.s. V. Leon

[Running Head]Brief of US v . LeonNameProfessorSchoolDateIssueShould the fourth Amendment exclusionary rule include as one of its exceptions the usher obtained by military officers acting in likely combine on a search physiognomy issued by a detached and neutral tag provided gear wheel up to be unsupported by probable causeStatement of FactsThe Burbank police force segment , upon receiving tips from informants conducted a drug trafficking investigation upon the respondents Extensive control surgery was made on respondent s three residences and some(prenominal) cars . aft(prenominal) fitting recite was gathered an officer prepared an screening for a warranty to search respondent s three residences and several vehicles . A search warrant which is facially valid was issued by the judge after examining the supporti ng affidavits and documents . The search later on yielded grown quantities of drugs and other indorseRespondents were eventually indicted for federal drug offenses . They thence d motions to suppress the evidence seized by reason of the defective warrant . After an evidentiary hearing , the District dally grant the motions in part and concluded that the affidavit was stingy to cave in probable cause . It also concluded that the officer who gain for a search warrant had acted in unplayful belief but rejected their argument that the one-quarter Amendment Exclusionary encounter should non apply where the evidence is seized in reasonable and good-faith reliance on a search warrantThe Holding /Decision of the CourtThe quarter Amendment exclusionary rule should not be restrictively applied so as hinder the prosecution from presenting pieces of evidence obtained by officers who acted in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral judge but ul timately set in motion to be invalid and un! supported by probable causeReasons /RationaleIn safekeeping in favor of the law enforcement officers , the dogmatic Court rule that the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule was not intentional to serve as a somebodyal constitutional chasten of the injured person .

The use of the evidence taken during an flagitious search does not necessarily constitute a impact of the Fourth Amendment kind of the exclusionary rule merely seeks to safeguard Fourth Amendment right by deterring officers from conducting unlawful searchesIn determining whether the exclusion of evidence is an appropriate authorize , the accost wei ghed the costs and benefits of preventing the use of evidence illegally obtained . fit to the court , the upholding of the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule has heavy repercussions for the truth-finding functions of the judge and the venire . This principle has allowed defendants to go free or receive cut down sentence even if they are chargeable . The indiscriminate operation of this rule hinders and hampers the efficient and effective administration of justiceAlthough it was clear that they did not question the application of the rule that evidence obtained in essential and deliberate violation of the Fourth Amendment should be made impermissible in court . However , the court thought that it was cartridge holder to weigh the cost and benefit of the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule and to transfer it to permit the...If you want to get a full essay, companionship it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you wa nt to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper