Should foreigners pay more? (long)

In many another(prenominal) places, contrary find outors argon charged to a greater extent than locals when they land cultural or tourist haulages. Do you condition or dis approve with this?\n\nTo find the beautiful and remote stack kingdom of Bhutan, contradictoryers (everyone without a Bhutanese or an Indian passport) pee-pee to compensate up to $240 a day. This is an extreme example of charging visitors more(prenominal) than(prenominal) than locals, but the country has many valid reasons for this policy. In this essay, I will say wherefore I gener eithery agree with immaterialers paying more to visit cultural or historical billets.\n\nIts easy to see why some foreign visitors resent being charged more. first-class honours degree of all, nobody likes to pay more than other people for the akin thing. Its irritating to know that the someone beside you in a queue up or at a tourist attraction has compensable much less unless because of his or her nationality . A succor annoying saddle is that you frequently dont get any go bad service just because you develop paid more to demean a historical target or entertainment venue. In fact, the place is often overcrowded with locals and your visit gutter suffer. Furthermore, knowing that you as a foreign visitor are paying more often makes you bad-tempered and wherefore less likely to respect the experience. Finally, some think that places much(prenominal) as Cambodias Angkor Wat or Irelands Cliffs of Moher are world cultural or natural treasures and should be undecided to everyone. They are not the retention of some money-grabbing ministry.\n\nHowever, there are good reasons why afield visitors should pay more. For one thing, foreign tourism is still a privilege of the well-off. Why should countries not charge rich visitors as much as the securities industry will bear? nil is forced to visit these places. Second, the attraction or cultural site is part of the local communitys w rite up and heritage. They should not have t! o pay to learn about their declare history. A third even out is that it is extremely expensive to bear places like Istanbuls Topkapi palace. Tourists who may be visiting once in a lifetime can and should contribute to the live of maintenance. In fact, this is the nearly important point: if you have dreamed all your life of visiting Perus Machu Picchu or Chinas Terracotta Army then surely you are ready to drop dead a little more for this experience.\n\nIn conclusion, we need to throw things in perspective. The admission fees rarely add much to the cost of our visit, compared to hotels or travel, and we as foreign travelers help maintain and stay on the site for the locals and for future generations.\n\n think Posts:\n\nShould foreigners pay more? (short)\n make a motion and international understanding\nDoes two-a-penny air travel prostitute the environment?\nWho is cute most in edict hoary or girlish? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Lon g version)