.

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Steryotypes Of Teenagers

I am writing to inform you almost how I feel when I chance on certain names that have been published in your newspaper. Most of these articles be just about teen climb onrs with a lot of negative coverage. I hope through this letter that you will understand what so some teenagers feel when reading the negative articles that YOU publish. Hopefully, after this letter you wont ever stereotype anyone without full information about them again. It was just operate week that I was reading a copy of The Sun when my look focussed on this one article, it was titled Jeremys Happy hell dust Ordeal.My eye then alighted on Jeremy Clarksons face, (the guy from crystalize Gear) and that I think just spurred me on to read more. I didnt really know what to expect but honestly I had no idea this was about teenagers. Whilst reading this article I realized something was wrong. normally when you have an article alike this in the newspapers theres invariably two points of view. Normally the t wo parties or persons involved have a say, but this particular article shows extreme bias.We simply hear Jeremys point of view and leave the teenagers opinions unheard. Personally I think this is very(prenominal) unfair, when journalists do things like this, its not right its really very sly and manipulative. You instantly portray Clarkson as our man the dupe and the others as a gang of teenage thugs. How are readers going to have a balanced view of the situation, when this is how you set the article up? There is one quote in the article about police which I am angry about, which is the police?Oh come on they are too engage filling in health and galosh forms and processing speeding fines. This quote irritates me dramati screamy because frankly its not true. The, I see them police are not too busy with speeding fines or health and safety forms. I always see police when I go out dealing with young sot men or people brawling in the street. This evidences me that Jeremy was wrong about the police. Jeremy Clarkson has seemingly been brainwashed by the media.Hes just making assumptions about stuff, like most famous people do, because unlike some people he doesnt have the decency to go and talk to teenagers and find out the truth, or maybe there arent any brains in his head. Either that or HIS parents didnt bring him up properly. His parents probably didnt teach him rudimentary manners and he doesnt know what being polite is. interestingly enough, as I was reading on I noticed how self-conceited and arrogant he was when discussing the parenting skills of these teenagers.Jeremy states that Nothing can be done about the parents because they are too thick. Yes, he is attempting to be humorous, but there is truth, in his eyes, in what he is saying and it is finishensive I powerfully take issue with him because parents have the intelligence to do anything for their kids and help them through their lives. I was actually very enraged at this, I can tell you that my parents are NOT and I repeat NOT thick. Rather they are very intelligent because to raise a baby into a handsome female/male with basic manners and high morals takes a lot.I can understand why he is thinking like this because he didnt have a very happy ending of the bet with the teens but common who needs all of the aggression? He starts off by branding teenagers as brutal thugs who love drink a lot of cider and love to stab passers-by. When i read this i feel really outraged that he has the audacity to say such things, I mean how the hell does he know all teenagers are like this. I can confirm to you that i am a teenager and me and my friends dont drink vast quantities of alcohol or love to stab passers-by as a hobby.I have to say he is being really ignorant because hes trying to retrace teenagers look all violent and whats really weird is that the teens didnt touch him but he just thought hed just grab the ringleader by the scruff of his neck. Now what do you call that? I s ay thats what you would call a middle age thug. Now there is no way you can disagree with me he was the aggressor there, he just assumed it was ok to compel violence on a group of teens who hadnt even moved(p) him.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.